On John Edwards In Memphis

In 1968 Robert Kennedy waged a war for the soul of America. And he awakened the souls of those who listened.  He walked in the streets of both metropolis and the ghetto, and everywhere he went crowds of people reached to touch him.  He gave himself to the people, sometimes shaking hands until his own were bloody from being scratched by fingernails.  Kennedy did something rarely seen in politics, he went over the heads of the party bosses and Washington insiders, and took his message directly to the people.  
    He did things more "prudent" politicians wouldn't.  He went to Alabama to deliver a speech on racial equality the same year that Ronald Reagan spoke in neighboring Mississippi on behalf of "states rights". When speaking at University of Indiana Medical School,   a heckler asked where he would get the money for his proposed health care plan, Kennedy retorted ,"From you".  Then added "Let me say something about the tone of these questions.  I look around this room and I don't see many black faces that will become doctors...Part of a civilized society is to let people go to medical school who come from ghettos...You are the privaleged ones...It's our society, not just our government, that spends twice as much on pets as on the poverty program.  It's the poor who carry the burden in Vietnam.  You sit here as white medical students, while black people carry the burden of the fighting in Vietnam."
        Bobby didn't have time for bullshit.  He had a country to save.  In photos from this campaign one can see the gravity of his concern burned into his face.

     The ghosts of 1968 loom large over the American presidential election some 40 years later.  Again we find ourselves deeply divided, embattled needlessly in a foreign land, lead by an administration that seems delusional in its very stubbornness, and ready for great change.
    Monday night John Edwards came to Memphis, Tennessee to speak about poverty.  The site he chose couldn't have been more appropriate: the Memphis Inter Faith Alliance building on Peabody and Vance, about halfway between the temple where Dr. King imparted his final wisdom to the world and the hotel balcony where man thought he could silence the dream by slaying the dreamer. The very heart of the "poorest zip-code" in Tennessee. I was very proud of Edwards for choosing this location as I had criticized him in 2004 for campaigning at Memphis's plush Orpheum Theater.
    The room was filled with people as the First Baptist Church choir sang with their soulful and funky praise band.  There were inspiring speeches a two homeless women whom MIFA was helping get back on their feet, and then John Edwards took the stage, and I realized that unfortunately he is not Bobby Kennedy.
    His speech was mostly what you would expect a Democratic politician to say about poverty and what he did say was very true, but something about Edwards's remarks left me wanting.  I don't doubt Edwards truly wants to fight poverty, but the authenticity just wasn't apparent.  Even though he never once mentioned his presidential campaign, and no 'Edwards '08' signs were visible,  the event still had the polished stink of a political rally.  Perhaps it was the discord between the subject matter he spoke of and his all too easy smile that peppered the speech.  Maybe it was the fact that he never once mentioned the war in Iraq, though it is not the rich who fight it.  Or it could be that he only made indirect references to our current health care crisis, although it is the poor who bear it's brunt.  Maybe what bothered me was that I couldn't imagine Bobby Kennedy or Martin Luther King  practically congratulating themselves for talking about poverty, as Edwards basically did when he went into his "people ask me, why do you talk about this" routine.  Everyone in his audience already knew why poverty needed to be discussed, that's why they were there.
I left the event less certain that Edwards really understands the gravity of the issue of poverty, and how it is deeply connected to most other major issues we face today.
    As Edwards finished his speech, he walked around the front of the stage to shake hands with people who were close enough, then zipped out to a waiting campaign van and was off as quickly as he had come.  As I left the building, I overheard some of the comments of other who had gathered there and learned that my feelings weren't unshared. "He deserves a seat at the roundtable", one woman said, "but not the big one".
    When Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King talked about war and poverty, they found the language of politics to be inadequate,so they spoke in the language of the spirit.  They showed that these issues are bigger than us, and even bigger than America itself, they strike at the very core of humanity.  This is why they rejected offering simple political platitudes in favor of quoting from the Bible and the wisdom of the ancient greeks.  Hearing their words even today can prick a listener's conscience and inspire him to act.  I believe John Edwards is a decent man who wants to make this country a better place, and improve the situation of the dispossessed, but he could learn a lot by studying the ghosts of 1968.
    Walking in the dark Memphis night and seeing the shadows of the convenience stores with steel-barred windows, or the crumbling apartment complexes lining the streets of a neighborhood in desperate need, I was left with one thought.  John Edwards showed up.  That is more than this neighborhood has been able to say about any politician in a long time.

Display:


Re: On John Edwards In Memphis (none / 0)

Wow alot of Robert Kennedy talk around.  Apologies Demo37, I didn't see your diary until after I had written this and damn if I was gonna let a good couple of hours go to waste.


by ArkansasLib on Tue Jul 17, 2007 at 03:50:50 AM EST

Re: On John Edwards In Memphis (3.00 / 2)

It's too bad that you found Edwards wanting somewhat ArkansasLib because let's face it, he's the best chance the poor have.

As you concluded,John showed up and that has not been said about a politician in a long time, and it won't be said again if Edwards is not elected.


by 12345 on Tue Jul 17, 2007 at 05:49:51 AM EST

Re: On John Edwards In Memphis (none / 0)

I think this is a ridiculous political appeal.  If poverty ceases to be talked about if Edwards doesn't win, it' OUR fault for letting candidates not talk about it.

Right now I am leaning Edwards, because his heart is clearly in the right place, but it is important to see what he could do better, and to separate the man from the issue.


by ArkansasLib on Tue Jul 17, 2007 at 12:58:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: On John Edwards In Memphis (3.00 / 1)

1. You complain that Edwards congratulated himself for talking about poverty because poor people already know that it should be talked about. But poor people already know that health care and the war should be talked about too. So why mention those then too?

2. Were you already supporting another candidate?

3. Are any other candidates doing nearly as much as John Edwards is in terms of poverty?

4. Which candidate has the most aggressive plan to end the war AND enact universal health care for all americans in a manner that will lead to single payer health insurance?

It's fine to criticize the speech (and his smile?)  but at least acknowledge that none of the other candidates apparently even WANT a seat at such an event.
 


by adamterando on Tue Jul 17, 2007 at 07:16:34 AM EST

Re: On John Edwards In Memphis (3.00 / 1)

ArkansasLib has an agenda and a candidate to support.

Re: George Will: Obama the new Reagan (none / 0)

he'd win a couple in the south, too.
Obama would put Arkansas, Tennessee, and Louisiana into play.
by ArkansasLib on Tue May 15, 2007 at 06:51:44 PM EST

And there is nothing wrong with having one candidate and going to another's event.  Obviously ArkansasLib was not won over by Edwards at the event.  However appearing neutral when one isn't and casting doubt on the effectiveness of the event is a little disingenuous.  ArkansasLib did not go to the event to be won over.  The report would have been more honest if he had just said that.  

I'm sure that Edwards won support and also did not win over others.  But if you are trying to appear neutral and subtly implying that he wasn't good enough and those are the only quotes you provide, then the report is not to be trusted.  I have heard Obama supporters being impressed by Edwards in person and still choosing to support Obama.  This report is meant to plant doubt by what it does not reveal about the writer.


I am an Edwards Democrat. Visit EENR blog for Progressives
by pioneer111 on Tue Jul 17, 2007 at 09:51:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: On John Edwards In Memphis (none / 0)

Listen pioneer111, I have no Obama ax to grind, and am constantly astounded by how you Obama and Edwards guys can read treachery into almost anything.

I just don't understand how you guys can blindly support your candidate and not admit there are areas in which they could improve.  None of these guys is a perfect candidate, that doesn't mean we shouldn't want them to get better.

As I've said before, I am supporting Edwards right now, but if I was on the fence, your tactics wouldn't push me in his direction.


by ArkansasLib on Tue Jul 17, 2007 at 01:07:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: On John Edwards In Memphis (none / 0)

1. I am not asking him to tell me WHY he should talk about Health Care or WHY he should talk about poverty,which is what he was telling me, I am asking him to talk about health care and poverty.  It is part of letting people know you get it.

2. I was between Obama and Edwards, now with Edwards.

3. No.

4. I don't see how Edwards plan would lead to single payer coverage, but I hope it does.

It's not his smile itself that I'm criticizing, it's the fact that it seems inappropriate in a speech about poverty.


by ArkansasLib on Tue Jul 17, 2007 at 01:02:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Well if he's not (3.00 / 1)

as good as Martin Luther King, then I simply can't support him.


by david mizner on Tue Jul 17, 2007 at 09:44:24 AM EST

Re: On John Edwards In Memphis (none / 0)

I understand all of your comments, and let me say that Edwards simply showing up has earned my vote.  I was leaning Obama, but until he comes down here and shows he's interested in these people, I'm now an Edwards supporter.  That's the conclusion of my article, although not directly stated.

My disappointment is that these could be really powerful events if Edwards could just break loose of some of his political habits (the smiling, his speech pacing) and just let his compassion show through.  You don't need to smile in a speech about poverty, newspaper cameras be damned.

Basically, I want Edwards to communicate that this is more than a political matter, it is something that makes all out lives less rich.

And for those of you who want me to say it directly, Obama and Clinton have not showed up in these neighborhoods, and until they do, I plan on voting for Edwards.

He may not have the talk down yet, but at least he's walking the walk.


by ArkansasLib on Tue Jul 17, 2007 at 12:49:00 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.